Recent Opportunities

  • Panel Discussion: New Architectures and Urbanisms of Decentralization

    Chicago | Dates: 21 – 21 Jul, 2016
    This panel discussion, moderated by Judith De Jong and Marshall Brown, questions new forms of decentralized urbanism in the contemporary American metropolis.

    While references to American suburbia typically conjure an image of vast, homogeneous tracts of post-war residential neighborhoods, this roundtable begins with an understanding that decentralization is neither new, nor specifically American. Rather, it is evident as early as the third millennium BCE, where outlying settlements of Mesopotamian cities focused on commerce and industry. Early American suburbia was likewise often industrial, and developed distinct municipalities; some of which were annexed by their central cities, while others faded into oblivion or developed into thriving economic hubs. Therefore, when looking historically, decentralization has traditionally acted back upon the city center, forcing a reconsideration of urban forms and qualities.

    The contemporary American metropolis is characterized by a wide range of decentralized urbanisms, many of which exhibit open or loose formal and spatial patterns. However, because these patterns are harder to identify, understand, and instrumentalize, and because the architecture is so often banal, these conditions are easily dismissed. This panel discussion seeks to re-examine these urban forms, as they are often some of the largest and fastest growing parts of a metropolis, as well as generators of innovative new architectures. It asks: What are these new forms of architecture and urbanism in the decentralized American metropolis? What are the primary forces being materialized in their making? And what are the opportunities for the future?

    Marshall Brown is an architect and principal of Marshall Brown Projects and an Associate Professor at the IIT College of Architecture.
    Robert Bruegmann is an historian and critic of the built environment and Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Art History, Architecture and Urban Planning at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
    Architect Claire Cahan is Design Director at Studio Gang, an architecture and urbanism collective based in Chicago and New York.
    Judith K. De Jong is an architect, urbanist, and Associate Professor of Architecture at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
    Andrew Metter is Principal Design Consultant at Epstein in Chicago, Illinois.
    Juan Gabriel Moreno, is an architect and President/Founder of JGMA (Juan Gabriel Moreno Architects).
    Mark Muenzer is the Director of Community Development for the City of Evanston, Illinois. 
  • The Robert H. N. Ho Family Foundation Program in Buddhist Studies

    Dates: 14 Jul – 15 Nov, 2016
    The American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS) announces the fourth year of an initiative supporting research and teaching in Buddhist studies, funded by a three-year grant of $6.7 million from The Robert H. N. Ho Family Foundation. In cooperation with the Foundation, ACLS offers an integrated set of fellowship and grant competitions that will expand the understanding and interpretation of Buddhist thought in scholarship and society, strengthen international networks of Buddhist studies, and increase the visibility of innovative currents in those studies.

    The Foundation offers five competitions to support research and teaching.

    The Robert H. N. Ho Family Foundation Dissertation Fellowships in Buddhist Studies
    The Robert H. N. Ho Family Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowships in Buddhist Studies
    The Robert H. N. Ho Family Foundation Collaborative Research Fellowships in Buddhist Studies
    The Robert H. N. Ho Family Foundation Research Fellowships in Buddhist Studies
    The Robert H. N. Ho Family Foundation New Professorships in Buddhist Studies

    These are global competitions. There are no restrictions as to the location of work proposed or the citizenship of applicants. The final products of  research supported may be in any language. It is especially important, therefore, to publicize the program in Asia, both because Asia is the historical home of Buddhist traditions and because it is the site of outstanding contemporary scholarship.

    Information about these fellowships and grants is now available in Burmese, Chinese (Cantonese and Mandarin), Hindi, Japanese, Khmer, Korean, Lao, Mongolian, Nepali, Sinhala, Tamil, Thai, and Vietnamese.  The translations will circulate information about the program more widely, including via local Internet search engines.

    Although the final products of research may be in any language, all applications must be submitted in English.

    Applications must be submitted through the ACLS Online Fellowship Application system (OFA). Applications will be available by August 31, 2016.
  • "Foundations and Futures" 2016 Exhibit Columbus Symposium

    Columbus | Dates: 29 Sep – 01 Oct, 2016
    "Foundations and Futures," the 2016 inaugural symposium for Exhibit Columbus, will be held September 29 to October 1. In addition to a keynote session featuring the return of some Columbus legends, Deborah Berke, Will Miller, Robert A. M. Stern, and Michael Van Valkenburgh, you will get to hear from experts in architectural history, community members that built and maintain many of the landmarks around the city, manufacturing and fabrication experts, and discussions with all ten of the designers selected to participating in the J. Irwin and Xenia S. Miller Prize Competition.
  • Richard Nickel: Dangerous Years

    Chicago | Dates: 19 Jul, 2016
    Author Richard Cahan will present a lecture on his third book dedicated to the photographer and preservationist Richard Nickel, who was also one of the founders of Glessner House Museum in 1966. Cahan’s most recent volume utilizes Nickel’s own writings - from long letters to quick notes - that convey Nickel’s commitment to preservation, the joys of discovery, and moments of despair as Louis Sullivan’s buildings fell one after another during the 1950s and 1960s. His words and photographs continue to inspire us today. Copies of the book, co-authored by Michael Williams, will be available for purchase and signing.
  • Irving J. Gill: New Architecture For a Great Country

    San Diego | Dates: 24 Sep, 2016 – 31 Mar, 2017
    Architect Irving J. Gill was a San Diego architect, by way of Chicago, who relished the opportunity to work in this city during the end of the late 19th and early 20th centuries.  He saw San Diego as a blank slate with great potential. Inspired by the coast and canyons, sunlight and shadows, Gill created a new design language, what we now call modern architecture. His simple, block-like designs offered simplicity, clean lines, and efficiency at a time when faux-Victorian and Spanish Colonial architecture were mainstream. Once sought after by many of San Diego elites like, Ellen Browning Scripps and Melville Klauber, his legacy was largely overlooked after his death.

    San Diegans today may not know the name Irving Gill, but they are, perhaps unknowingly, aware of his influential and livable architecture.  From the home of Ellen Browning Scripps (today’s Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego in La Jolla), to the Bishop’s School in La Jolla, to the Sacred Heart Church in Coronado, the Marston House in Balboa Park, the Americanization School in Oceanside, and the Barona Indian Reservation in Lakeside. Gill’s designs made a lasting mark on San Diego County and the influence architects and their clients to this day.

    Visit the History Center’s exhibition Irving J. Gill: New Architecture for a Great Country to learn more about this fascinating and sometimes misunderstood individual who helped create in a new style of architecture revered throughout the world, but one that originated right here in San Diego.
  • CFP: Enchanted, Stereotyped, Civilized: Garden Narratives in Literature, Art and Film

    Dates: 13 Jul – 15 Oct, 2016
    Deadline: Oct 15, 2016

    Gardens have been a crucial part in mythology and literature. 
    Throughout English literature for example, the idea of a garden is a recurrent image; these images largely stem from the story of the Garden of Eden which is found in the Genesis, the first book of the Bible. 
    Gardens reveal the relationship between culture and nature – the garden can be seen as civilized and ‘shaped’ and therefore domesticated nature –, in the vast library of garden literature few books focus on what the garden means – on the ecology of garden as idea, place, and action. Our volume will discuss the topic of the garden in different theoretical contexts such as ecological, botanical, literary, filmic, art historical and cultural ones. We want to investigate the representations of and the interconnections between gardens and the above named fields over a wide timescale, with consideration of how gardens are represented and used as symbols and of how – for example – literature or visuality took form in, or influenced, gardens.

    Suggested topics include, but are by no means limited to the following:
    - The Biblical/Theological Garden
    - The Mythological Garden
    - The Renaissance Garden
    - The Romantic Garden
    - The Revolutionary Garden
    - The Colonial/Postcolonial Garden
    - Gardens in film
    - Gardens in Art History
    - The Garden as…
    > a location in general and as a place of romanticism specifically a 
    > crime scene a labyrinth and therefore as a mirror of psychological 
    > conditions
    - Ecological aspects on garden culture

    The timetable for the volume is as follows:
    - The deadline for abstracts: October 15, 2016
    - Feedback: October 31, 2016
    - Submission for articles (completed): April 30, 2017
    - Double peer review process and feedback due to: May 30, 2017
    - Articles sent back to editors: mid of June 2017

    A publication is planned during autumn/winter 2017.

    Chapters may explore different media (literature, movies, art, visual arts, television, etc.) and address topics on gardens. If you are interested in proposing a chapter, please email an abstract of 500 words and a short CV to both Dr. Feryal Cubukcu
    ( and Dr. Sabine Planka (
    Your abstract should outline your hypothesis and briefly sketch the theoretical framework(s) within which your chapter will be situated. 
    All submissions will be acknowledged. If you do not receive a confirmation of receipt within 48 hours, you may assume that your email was lost in the depths of cyberspace. In that case, please re-submit. 
    Please note that we will not include previously published essays in the collection.
  • CFP: Impenetrable Architecture in Medieval Art - Session at ICMS 2017 (Kalamazoo, 11-14 May 17)

    Kalamazoo | Dates: 13 Jul – 15 Sep, 2016
    Co­Organizers: Danny Smith and Lora Webb, Stanford University

    “The depicted door,” Jas Elsner has written of the fourth century Pola Casket, “is a kind of make­believe that might open into the box or out of which the box’s contents might venture.” The doors of the ivory casket suggest an architectural space, but one that remains wholly impenetrable to anything but the imagination. Inspired by the recent focus on absconded or hidden art objects, this panel will address the inaccessible architectures of the medieval world to ask: how do we understand space we cannot enter?

    Whether in the form of ecclesiastic spaces closed to the public, sarcophagi or censors in the form of microarchitectural models, or ruined or destroyed spaces, much of the interior architectural space of the medieval period remains steadfastly impenetrable. How can we, as scholars, interpret spaces into which we can never ourselves enter? How does the study of medieval architecture change when the architectural space is impenetrable? Does painted architecture, micro­architecture, or lost architecture demand a different kind of methodology?

    We welcome all papers pertinent to the study of impenetrable or impossible architecture in a medieval context. Topics may include:
    micro­architecture, visionary architecture, spatial or architectural ekphrasis, lost or ruined architecture, medieval architectural models, the social stratification of architectural space, or architectural historiography. 

    Paper proposals should consist of the following:
    - Abstract of proposed paper (no more than 350 words)
    - Completed Participant Information Form – available on the conference website here:

    - CV with contact information.

    Danny Smith ( and Lora Webb (
  • Young Professionals Summer Mixer at Glessner House

    Chicago | Dates: 04 Aug, 2016
    Skyline Council and Glessner House Museum present an evening for young professional organizations to meet, mingle and network while celebrating the museum’s 50th anniversary.

    A National Historic Landmark, Glessner House was designed by noted American architect Henry Hobson Richardson and completed in 1887. It remains an internationally-known architectural treasure in Chicago. A radical departure from traditional Victorian architecture, the structure served as an inspiration to architects such as Louis Sullivan, Mies van der Rohe, and the young Frank Lloyd Wright and helped redefine domestic architecture. This year, Glessner House Museum celebrates its 50th Anniversary.
  • Architectural Historian required for panel debate on resilience of cities

    London | Dates: 08 – 08 Mar, 2017
    I work in a voluntary capacity for CoreNet, the Corporate Real Estate Network in London. We have an annual conference every March which is attended by c320 corporate real estate professionals. We’re looking for an architectural historian to join a panel at our 2017 event. The theme is resilience and the person in question would be asked to talk/ discuss the resilience of cities, and how cities have come and gone and what makes a city resilient.
  • ARPA Journal, Issue 05 "Conflicts of Interest": Call for Submissions

    Dates: 13 Jul – 01 Sep, 2016
    “Conflicts of interest” are said to compromise the impartiality of research, but what would it mean to be disinterested? Ethical codes warn us that researchers’ objectivity can be corrupted by a clashing set of interests—those of funding agencies, clients and publics, as well as researchers’ self-interest in professional advancement or personal gain. If the resolution of such conflicts might typically call for avoidance, recusal or disclosure, what would such strategies mean for the design disciplines and research on the built environment? What varied interests, expressed in the form of money or other manifestations of influence, do designers contend with? Who does impartiality protect, and when are conflicts of interest productive? Issue 05 asks how researchers define an ethics of interest and disinterest across diverse structures of research funding. How do designers reify, leverage, alter or sidestep the constraints of financial support, and from what vantage points? How is the value of research assessed, and in what marketplaces? Beyond the automotive industry’s role in the Federal-Aid Highway Act or BP’s now-defunct sponsorship of the Tate Modern, even the most speculative work is governed by the economics of research. Universities shape niche publishing industries by determining tenure criteria and create new structures for commercialization as student debts escalate. Government agencies and NGOs issue grants captured from local tax bases or global markets to test ever-changing definitions of welfare, social justice and development. Even Silicon Valley-style start-ups and crowd-funding campaigns rely on licensing and liability protocols developed within the service professions. From philanthropy to profit, and from patronage to entrepreneurship, we hope to examine how researchers locate their role in directing the systemic reach of such funding structures. SUBMISSION GUIDELINES We seek thoughtful and playful approaches to applied research in the built environment. Contributions may include opinion pieces, research papers on pivotal moments from a history of applied research, speculative drawing series about the protocols of research practice or photo essays on research projects. For this issue especially, we welcome opportunities to publish interviews with representatives of foundations, government agencies and design practices. Articles are not limited in length (600-2000 words, recommended) and can be published as text, photo essays, videos or other media. Contributors are encouraged to demonstrate techniques and protocols in meticulous detail. Eligibility to contribute is not limited by institutional affiliation or area of expertise. To apply, email the following in one pdf document to - Title and subtitle - Author name and 50-word bio - Abstract describing context, argument and intended format and length of your proposed contribution, 300 words max. - Design or writing samples and website urls, optional. Deadlines for Issue 05 are as follows: - Sep 1 2016: Abstracts due (we will also review abstracts on a rolling basis throughout the summer of 2016, so feel free to send them in advance). - Jan 9 2017: Contributions due (once selected). - May 2017: Publication.
  • Pella Crafted Luxury - Movie Night Hosted by Milos Stehlik

    Chicago | Dates: 21 Jul, 2016
    Milos Stehlik, founder of Facets and WBEZ movie critic, will introduce the first of two movie nights devoted to architecture on film. He will screen L’inhumaine, directed in 1924 by Marcel L’Herbier, one of the legendary achievements of early French cinema in a newly restored version, with modernist sets designed by the architect Robert Mallet- Stevens and by Fernand Léger.

    Appetizers and cocktails will be provided. Space is limited. RSVP required.
  • Call for Submissions #32: Character Issue of MAS Context

    Dates: 11 Jul – 31 Aug, 2016
    The winter issue of MAS Context will focus on the topic of CHARACTER.

    What are the opportunities of conjuring fictional characters as a device to demonstrate how a building is experienced? What makes a building have or become a character? Why do architects sometimes consciously formulate their own persona as a quasi-fictional character? We are looking for critical writing, photo essays, analytical studies, data visualizations, visual explorations, architectural projects, interviews, films, etc. that probe at these questions to include in our CHARACTER issue. Join us as we consider architecture in literary terms in order to reimagine how buildings can communicate with audiences through form, expression, structure, type, decoration, experience, narrative, and metaphor.
    For more information about the submission process, visit our submission guidelines.
    Please, send your submission to by midnight (CST) on Sunday July 31. Full contributions if selected will be due August 31, 2016.

    This issue will be guest edited by Stewart Hicks and Allison Newmeyer of Design With Company.

  • CFP: Sessions at ICMS 2017 (Kalamazoo, 11-14 May 17)

    Kalamazoo | Dates: 15 Jul – 09 Sep, 2016
    Urban Planning:
    Buildings, Planning, and Networks of Medieval Cities  
    AVISTA sponsored sessions

    Broadly defined, urban planning is today a process one might describe 
    as half design and half social engineering.  One engaged in this 
    process considers not only the aesthetic and visual product, but also 
    the economic, political, and social implications, not to mention the 
    underlying or over-arching environmental impact of any given plan.
    While it appears that this sort of broad, multifaceted planning did not 
    take place in the middle ages because we do not have left to us the 
    tangible evidence—the maps, the drawings, the reports, recent 
    scholarship employing the methodological lens of Cultural Geography 
    seems to suggest otherwise.  Monastic historians, archaeologists, and 
    art historians have long demonstrated, based on the famous plan of St. 
    Gall, that monasteries, particularly those of the Cistercian order, 
    were very much concerned with planning in the rural sense. From the 
    intricacies of the water infrastructure, to the ordered logic of the 
    space, to the esoteric qualities of metaphysical light, to the seasonal 
    inter-dependence of pigs and pollarded oak trees, there is ample 
    evidence to support a claim that the various components of an “urban 
    plan” were understood within the monastic realm during the Middle Ages.

    But what of the integration of these various parts? This session seeks 
    to explore and expand our comprehension of how those in roles of 
    authority—both within the monastic confines and the more secular 
    enivorns—saw the big picture.  Was there a plan or a planning process?  
    What can we say by way of an analysis of architectural complexes beyond 
    the monastic enclosure about this planning process?  Are there hints in 
    literary sources that indicate sensitivity to the correlation between 
    climate, architectural orientation and positive social interaction, or 
    indications in religious documents to illustrate a planned confluence 
    between visual or aural stimulation, water features and physical 
    well-being?  In the broader context of the secular built environment, 
    where historians frequently demonstrate the economic and political 
    interaction between monastic leadership and the local or regional 
    authorities, can we detect a specific replication or modeling of the 
    integrated concern with materials and aesthetics seen in the monastic 
    complex?  Similarly, where philosophic and religious scholars highlight 
    the mirrored nature of heaven and earth in medieval texts, can we find 
    evidence of this theoretical “ordering” being planned or integrated 
    into the secular world in the same way we can see it in the monastic 
    enclosure?   What can we learn by bringing together the views of the 
    architect, the archaeologist of infrastructure, and the environmental 
    biologist with those scholars of literature, sculptural ornamentation 
    and liturgy?  With these questions in mind, we seek papers from the 
    broadest interdisciplinary point of view, where we can identify 
    glimpses of a plan or, in the modern sense of the term, a planner.

    In the Middle Ages European and eastern Mediterranean/western Asian 
    cities developed from myriad situations, their cityscapes exhibiting a 
    variety of types, as Wolfgang Braunfels outlined in Abendländische 
    Stadtbaukunst: Herrschaftsform und Baugestalt (1976; English version, 
    Urban Design in Western Europe: Regime and Architecture, 900-1900, 
    1988). While much scholarship still focuses on archaeology and 
    individual sites, since Braunfels's publication research with a greater 
    breadth of perspectives is being tackled. This examines not only the 
    role of ecclesiastical architecture within civic society, but also on 
    secular building, the functions of which always interacted with 
    religious values of medieval culture. The proposed session invites 
    papers showing innovative research and discussing specific examples or 
    topics understood within a broad framework, on such issues as the forms 
    that medieval cities and buildings took and why, what infrastructure 
    was necessary to facilitate cultural growth, what pre-existing 
    buildings and spolia conveyed to the social network of urban 
    development, and why, as well as how, people moved about and operated 
    within urban contexts (including the ex-urban and rural Hinterland). 
    Within an urban setting—whether Christian, Jewish, Islamic, or some 
    combination thereof—structures that might be investigated include city 
    halls and courts, market halls, shops, merchants' hostelries (fondaci), 
    entertainment venues, hospitals, prisons, etc., as well as 
    infrastructure such as bridges, roads, and hydraulic elements, and 
    natural features such as topography, geological phenomena, and 
    environmental impacts, which might question how the rural was 
    integrated and/or maintained as attributes of the urban.

    Papers that view specific constructions as part of the whole social 
    fabric are welcome, as are those that consider how political, 
    geographical, economic, and social issues affected the built 
    environment, or conversely were affected by it, during this period when 
    a public sphere was emerging for the first time since the Roman Empire. 
    Send abstracts of 300 words to:
    Mickey Abel

    Deadline: September 15, 2017
    The Material, Visual, and Cultural Life of Scholasticism

    Organizer: Martin Schwarz, University of Chicago
    Chair and Respondent: Alex Novikoff, Fordham University

    This panel explores the cultural dimensions of Scholasticism, a topic 
    of study that has been largely confined to the realm of intellectual 
    history and the history of ideas. The term principally denotes the 
    profound revolution of knowledge and learning that swept across Europe 
    during the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, most notably through the 
    reception of Greco-Arabic learning, the development of new intellectual 
    methods and pedagogical practices, and the institutional formation of 
    higher education in universities. Broadly speaking, standard narratives 
    have traditionally cast Scholasticism as a purely intellectual and 
    therefore immaterial discourse dissociated from its immediate material 
    and cultural surroundings. More recently, however, scholars have begun 
    to question the disciplinary isolation of the study of Scholasticism, 
    challenging its reach from a variety of angles. In investigating, for 
    instance, Scholasticism’s dimension of sound and its relationship to 
    polyphonic music, the performative character of scholastic 
    disputations, its physical and aesthetic presence and expression in 
    urban space and architecture, or its dependence on literary forms and 
    visual representation, this new approach has in many respects sharpened 
    our perception of the co-dependence between intellectual and material 
    worlds—and has, consequently, demonstrated the need for an expanded, 
    integrative account that reckons both with the Scholasticism’s cultural 
    life and its centrality to the scholastic production of knowledge. 
    Accordingly, this panel invites contributions that address the 
    material, visual, spatial, and sonic dimensions and qualities of 
    Scholasticism from the twelfth to the fourteenth century. We aim to 
    bring together scholars from different backgrounds such as Art History, 
    Material and Visual Culture, Theatre Studies, Sound Studies, Urban 
    Studies, Musicology, and Literature to open new lines of inquiry and 
    reflect upon the disciplinary and methodological complexities of their 

    This panel will feature 15–20min papers. Please submit a 150-word 
    abstract with your paper title and a short CV by Sept 9, 2016 to Martin 
    Schwarz ( and Alex Novikoff 
  • Architectural and urban perspectives in travelers´ seeks

    Buenos Aires | Dates: 10 Jul – 30 Sep, 2016
    The Institute of American Art and Aesthetic Research "Mario J. Buschiazzo" (IAA), School of Architecture, Design and Urbanism, Universidad de Buenos Aires opens the Call for Papers for the Number 46 of its journal, Anales. This issue will focus on a particular topic: architectural and urban perspectives in travelers´ seeks. It calls for the submission of original articles related to the topic.
  • Making, Sustaining, Breaking – The Politics Of Heritage And Culture

    Heidelberg | Dates: 12 – 14 Oct, 2016
    Annual Conference
    Cluster of Excellence "Asia and Europe in a Global Context", Heidelberg
    Forum Transregionale Studien (Berlin) and the Max Weber Stiftung –
    Deutsche Geisteswissenschaftliche Institute im Ausland
    in collaboration with the German Archaeological Institute (Berlin)

    The deliberations of the conference will address some of the urgent
    questions that surround heritage as a political and cultural issue at a
    historical juncture when the idea of culture is being drawn into a
    field of intense contestation. While in certain intellectual circles
    and scholarly discussions culture is slowly but steadily being
    uncoupled from the nation, these impulses are at the same time being
    countered by moves to reinforce – even reinvent – national identities
    as culturally homogenous.  As societies confront their transcultural
    pasts, the concept of a monolithic, integrative heritage is not only
    becoming increasingly untenable, it is turning into a site of conflict.
    Ruptures induced by the spatial and cultural displacements that come
    with modernity and contemporary globalization have in turn meant a
    return to notions of an ancient, untainted civilizational identity in
    many regions of the world. Such positions cut across the domains of
    politics and civil society – they include political and institutional
    authorities as well as scholarly practices, have at the same time found
    articulation in religious extremism and xenophobia embodied by
    fundamentalist groups, themselves a modern, transnational phenomenon.
    Fissures within public spheres that cut across national boundaries in
    an increasingly connected world have brought questions of cultural
    heritage to the heart of any engagement with the tangled relationship
    between concepts of culture and the nation-state.
  • CFP: Picturesque Modernities (Paris, 30 Nov-2 Dec 16)

    Paris | Dates: 08 Jul – 15 Aug, 2016
    Call for Papers

    PICTURESQUE MODERNITIES. Architectural Regionalism as a Global Process

    International conference of the Cluster of Excellence “Asia and Europe
    in a Global Context” at Heidelberg University (Global Art History), the
    German Centre of Art History in Paris, University of Poitiers
    (CRIHAM/Department of Art History and Archaeology), the Centre André
    Chastel (CNRS/University Paris-Sorbonne) and the Association d’Histoire
    de l’Architecture (A.H.A).

    Concept: Michael Falser (Heidelberg University)

    In the last twenty years, architectural historiography approached
    regionalism as a pan-European movement between 1890 and 1950 which, as
    a flipside of the International Modern Movement with its rationalist
    and cosmopolitan agenda, helped to reinforce regional identities
    through the language of regionalist building styles. When European
    nation states such as France, Great Britain, Netherlands, Germany etc.
    entered a late-modern phase of political saturation and a stronger need
    of cultural self-definition, architectural regionalism emerged as a
    polymorphic set of artistic strategies: fostered either by centralist
    regimes to stabilize the national project through a higher (however
    controlled) valorisation of its peripheral elements, or by centrifugal
    forces towards provincial independence. In France, for example, this
    regionalist movement was particularly developed through a whole range
    identity-building structures in neo-Basque, neo-Breton etc. styles, but
    also in a kind of regionalist eclecticism for seaside architecture.

    Latest projects to write a ‘global history of architecture’ or a canon
    of ‘world architecture’ comprised of rather additive architectural
    case-studies around the globe with an ordering system along geographic
    and political entities (Europe or Non-Europe), but did not yet
    transpose the above-mentioned scenario to the global arena: in
    comparing the strategies of political and cultural stabilization,
    negotiation and/or resistance through architectural regionalism, a
    structural analogy of the centre-periphery model can also be detected
    between the European metropole and its overseas colonies, resp. between
    those colonies’ capitals and their own provinces. If ‘area studies’
    identified similar regionalist policy changes from cultural
    assimilation (direct transfer) to association (regional adaptation) for
    European colonies in Asia and Africa during the same period
    (1890-1950), then the emerging ‘neo-vernacular styles’ in the colonies
    (such as the Style indochinois in French Indochina or the
    ‘neo-Mauresque’ style in French North Africa, the Indo-Saracenic Style
    in British India, or the Indische Stijl in the Dutch East Indies etc.)
    – can be read as Non-European variants of ‘regionalist styles’ in the
    European nation states. This ‘trans-cultural’ approach frames the
    diverse regionalist formations of architectural styles and forms as one
    globally connected process.

    Transnational approaches to set the different European colonial
    contexts within the first half of the 20th century in relation to each
    other can also help to conceptualise the recent inter-related effects
    between globalisation and decentralisation (like in France) where the
    notions of the global and the local are often enmeshed simultaneously
    in contemporary architecture.

    Conceptualizing Global Connectivity in Architectural History

    Requested case studies can focus either on regionalist and
    (neo-)vernacular architectural style formations within European nation
    states or in European colonies. In order to conceptualize a
    transcultural matrix of global connectivity between the different forms
    of regionalist expressions beyond the strict divide of West or
    Non-West, Europe or Non-Europe, metropole or colony, colonizer or
    colonized, the different presentations will be set in direct relation
    to each other (e.g. France vs. French Indochina etc.). To facilitate
    the discussion of structural analogies and connections across those
    divides, the presentations should address the following questions on
    agency and process beyond a mere stylistic analysis:

    - In which centre-periphery constellation was the particular
    regionalist project embedded?
    - Which individual actors (architects, engineers, ethnographers,
    politicians) and institutions participated (or not) in the project?
    - To which kind of regional/vernacular expressions and traditions was
    referred to, and  how were those collected, valorised, hybridized or
    (re)invented, and finally applied?
    - Did the different projects, institutional agencies and individual
    agents (cultural brokers) cross the lines between the divides of the
    national vs. regional, metropole vs. colony etc.?
    - Where there any platforms of knowledge exchange involved across those
    divides (scientific journals, national/colonial congresses, exhibitions
    and fairs, individual networks etc.?

    The international conference in French, English and German will take
    place from 30 November to 2 December 2016 at the German Center for Art
    History in Paris. It is a collaborative exercise between the Cluster of
    Excellence ‘Asia and Europe in a Global Context – The Dynamics of
    Transculturality’ at Heidelberg University (and its project
    “Picturesque Modernities”, directed by Michael Falser/Global Art
    History), the German Centre of Art History in Paris (directed by Thomas
    Kirchner), the University of Poitiers (Centre de recherche
    interdisciplinaire en histoire, histoire de l’art et
    musicologie/CRIHAM, with its project “Corpus numérique du patrimoine
    architectural en région”, directed by Nabila Oulebsir), the Centre
    André Chastel (CNRS/University Paris-Sorbonne, directed by Alexandre
    Gady) and the Association d’Histoire de l’Architecture (directed by
    Jean-Baptiste Minnaert/University Paris-Sorbonne).

    This conference is the second event after the International Conference
    “Picturesque Eye. Framing Regionalist Art Forms in Late Empires
    (1900-1950)” which took place in Vienna/Austria in December 2015

    After this 1,5-day conference and half-day workshop for PhD-candidates
    is planned. Proposals for this workshop are also welcome.

    Applicants are asked to send a proposal (max. 300 words, one to two
    illustrations) to, by the deadline
    of 15 August 2016. Please include the title of the contribution, an
    abstract and a short bio-sketch of the speaker with affiliation and
    contact details. The decision about the selection of contributions will
    be announced in September 2016.
  • CFP: CAA 105th Annual Conference (New York, 15-18 Feb 17)

    New York | Dates: 08 Jul – 30 Aug, 2016
    The 2017 Call for Participation for the 105th Annual Conference, taking place February 15–18, 2017, in New York, NY, is now open.

    The 2017 Call for Participation describes approved sessions for next year’s conference which are seeking contributions. CAA and the session chairs invite your participation: please follow the instructions in the link to submit a proposal for a paper or presentation directly to the appropriate session chair(s). A call for Poster Session Proposals is also included in this CFP.

    The 2017 Call for Participation is only available as a PDF download; CAA will not mail hard copies of this document.

    The deadline for proposals of papers and presentations is August 30, 2016. The deadline for Poster Session Proposals is September 15, 2016.

    Santiago | Dates: 07 – 11 Jul, 2016
    N?13: Technology: Digital Material
    Publication date: August 2016
    Submission deadline: July 11th, 2016

    CALL FOR PAPERS // MATERIA ARQUITECTURA N?13 // Technology: Digital Material
    In the early 1990s, the use of digital technologies in architecture became popular, and some warned of the risks of the excessive virtualization of architecture and the emergence of a ?cyberspace? detached from materiality, construction, mass or gravity. Ubiquitous digital images rendering intangible spaces questioned the material character of architecture, a phenomenon that John Frazer[1] called a ?new architecture of process that transcends physicality and achieves ephemeralization?. In 1998, William Mitchell[2] proposed the concept of anti-tectonics to describe the new digital era characterized by the dematerialization of architecture; with that, he not only gave a name to the manifesto of virtuality, but he also became the delight of the soothsayers who saw their predictions confirmed.
    The current decade shows a different spirit. The fascination with the digital visual exuberance that characterized the beginning of the millennium has given way to a re-evaluation of the material and construction. The spread of Computer Numeric Control machines in architecture schools and firms is the most obvious symptom of the growing interest in the impact that digital technologies have on the material production of architecture. Digital technologies have acquired a physicality that does not dispute, but empowers, the material tradition of architecture. Digital manufacturing, robotic systems, simulation technologies, and the internet of things (IoT) intertwine the digital and the material to a point where efforts to distinguish them have become meaningless.

    This issue of Materia Arquitectura journal questions the traditional separation between the digital and the material as opposing domains, and, conversely, it invites reflection on digital technologies as enablers, or catalysts, of the physical. It investigates the disruption or evolution of ideas, concepts, methods, processes and techniques that contemporary ubiquitous computing poses to constructive methods, and, incidentally, opens the question about the coming impacts.


    To publish in MATERIA ARQUITECTURA, authors should submit their works electronically to:<> or to our postal address: sede Bellavista, Bellavista 7, Recoleta, Santiago de Chile.

    MATERIA ARQUITECTURA will only publish original and unpublished works. Texts and pictures will be the exclusive responsibility of the signing authors. Submitted manuscripts will be assessed by the Editorial Committee and by peer reviewers. Once the submitted material has been accepted, MATERIA ARQUITECTURA will contact the authors to give them specific instructions about the publication process. The sections open for collaborations are:


    Essays, research, articles. It has a thematic character (see I. Call for Papers) and it will publish essays and theoretical works which are the result of researches or specific works. Authors whose work have been selected by the Editorial Committee should consider and/or attach the following:

    Manuscript: maximum length 2,500 words.

    Abstract: maximum length 100 words.

    Five keywords.

    Citations, notes, references and bibliography must follow the rules of APA Style.

    Author?s biodata, 100 words maximum.

    Pictures, photographs (formats: TIFF, JPG, EPS. Resolution: 300 DPI).

    All submitted pictures must include: photo captions, data, source and authorization to be published.

    Plans (format: DWG).


    Critical review of architectural works and projects.

    Text: maximum length 1,000 words.

    Technical data.

    Architectural drawings (DWG), photographs and renders (300 DPI)


    Visual exploration related to Dossier's central theme.

    Introductory text: maximum length 400 words.

    8 to 20 images (300 DPI)

    The complete CALL FOR PAPERS for MATERIA ARQUITECTURA journal can be downloaded from the website:

    And from the link:
  • CFP: The Avery Review - Critical Essays on Architecture

    Dates: 07 Jul – 01 Aug, 2016
    Summer, a time for sunbathing, ice cream eating, and critical essaying. The Avery Review is seeking submissions for our fall issues, and there's no time like now to start writing. For full consideration for the fall semester, texts should be received by August 1.

    The Avery Review publishes reviews and critical essays on books, buildings, and other architectural media, broadly defined. Our essays are typically 2,500-4,000 words in length. All of this fall's issues will be unthemed. We ask that all essays have some object of review at their core (whether book, building, project, or idea), and that authors engage with the work of others rather than addressing their own design or scholarly work. We like stylish, concise, and accessible writing, and we invite our contributors to experiment with tone and format as suits their topic. We also welcome responses to essays that have already been published.

    Our submissions are open to any and all topics of the writers’ choosing. We welcome forays into theoretical; incisive studies of form; format-bending missives; and discipline-traversing expositions. For a brief list of books, buildings, and other projects that we’ve been pondering, please visit our periodically updated submissions page.

    Please note that the Avery Review selects pieces based upon editorial review and does not charge for article processing or submission. The Avery Review does pay a modest honorarium for published texts. All editorial decisions are made on the basis of completed texts, and it is typical for our essays to go through several rounds of editing. Please contact us with submissions and queries at
  • Summer School: Destruction and Reconstruction of Cultural Heritage

    Heidelberg | Dates: 07 – 20 Jul, 2016
    Heidelberg University / Germany, September 16 - 23, 2016
    Deadline: Jul 20, 2016

    Summer School „Destruction and Reconstruction of Cultural Heritage“

    The destruction of Cultural Heritage worldwide is a topic that receives 
    growing attention: Cultural Heritage is threatened in armed conflicts, 
    through climate change and environmental influences, and through 
    neglect. The Summer School 2016 aims at covering these topics by 
    assembling a wide range of scholars and experts to discuss the dangers 
    faced by Cultural Heritage as well as methods to preserve and 
    reconstruct it. What can be done to efficiently and professionally 
    protect Cultural Heritage? What dangers does it face? Which actors have 
    to be involved? Is the systemat-ic destruction of Cultural Heritage a 
    rather new phenomenon or has it been practiced throughout human 
    history? What can be done to prevent such destructions?

    The Summer School, funded by the Volkswagen Foundation, will deal with 
    all these questions. International experts from different fields (such 
    as Archaeology, History, Museum Studies, Law, Digital Humanities etc.) 
    as well as key-actors from the UNESCO and the Ministry of Foreign 
    Af-fairs will provide an interdisciplinary perspective on the topic. 
    Based on current research, outstand-ing knowledge and experience as 
    well as newly developed technologies, a comprehensive and profound 
    exchange with the participants will be sought.

    The Summer School will take place from September 16th to September 23rd 
    2016 at the University of Heidelberg and will be chaired by Prof. Dr. 
    Christian Witschel (Heidelberg Center for the Cultural Heritage), Dr. 
    Filippo Carlá-Uhink (University of Exeter), and Dr. Maja Gori 
    (Heidelberg University).

    The Summer School invites applications from doctoral students in 
    Archaeology, History, Art History, Law, Cultural Studies, Social and 
    Political Sciences and related fields. Sessions will be held in 
    English. A reader containing a comprehensive overview of the current 
    state of research will be provided in advance. Participants are also 
    expected to prepare a paper/contribution of their own according to 
    their field of interest which will be presented (15 to 20 minutes) 
    during the sum-mer school.

    There will be 15 places available. Travel and accommodation expenses of 
    the participants will be covered by the organizers.
    Your application (in English) should include:

    - A letter of motivation (2 pages max.) including an explanation as to 
    why you would like to participate in the Summer School and what 
    previous knowledge you have on the subject; additionally a short 
    description of your current PhD project should be given.

    - A short CV presenting the main steps of your academic career.
    Please send your application via e-mail as one PDF file to Michaela 
    Böttner at the HCCH ( You can also contact 
    Mrs. Böttner in case you need further in-formation.

    The deadline for applications is July 20th 2016.

SAH thanks The Richard H. Driehaus Foundation Fund at The Chicago Community Foundation for its operating support.
Society of Architectural Historians
1365 N. Astor Street
Chicago, Illinois 60610
Copyright - (c) 2012