SAH News


Dianne Harris: Guest Blogger on Frank Lloyd Wright for Chicago Humanities Festival

by Dianne Harris | Jul 09, 2013

Popular publications about architectural history tend to focus on a few male architects who designed big buildings and who possessed equally big egos. Their names are familiar to most members of the general public because their work was so well documented and their lives so well chronicled. They are variously represented as heroic, flamboyant, eccentric, obsessive. If asked to identify just one famous architect, most Americans will utter three names in rapid sequence: Frank. Lloyd. Wright. Indeed, no architect has captured the imagination of both scholars and the general public like this prolific man who produced hundreds of built works and more than a thousand designs during a career that spanned nearly 75 years in practice.

Without question, Wright, along with those who worked in his offices, produced extraordinary and unforgettable buildings: Fallingwater, the Guggenheim Museum, his Prairie School houses, and his Usonian houses, to name just a few of his remarkable achievements. That he also lived a life punctuated with highly visible dramatic episodes makes him the perfect attraction for authors who have created a veritable cottage industry devoted to publishing books and articles about Wright and his colorful life. The bibliography for his Wikipedia entry alone lists 37 publications, but it’s accurate to say that hundreds now exist. With such an abundance of literature focusing on Wright, it would be easy to imagine that there’s little more to be said about either the man or his works, few meaningful questions yet to be asked. And until very recently, most Wright studies had to be conducted at one of two closely-guarded locations: Wright’s former headquarters in Spring Green, Wisconsin and Taliesin West in Scottsdale, Arizona. The location and circumstances of access meant that Wright studies have been, at least to some extent, circumscribed—their scope and focus limited by the contexts in which the documents and artifacts of Wright’s career were situated.

All that changed in September 2012, when the New York Times announced that the entire Wright archive—all 23,000 drawings, 44,000 photographs, 600 manuscripts, 300,000 pieces of correspondence, and 40 architectural models—would be moved to Manhattan. The models are now housed at the Museum of Modern Art; Columbia University’s renowned Avery Architectural and Fine Arts Library has become the new and very appropriate home for the rest of the collection. The move makes possible significantly increased levels of accessibility to these primary sources. That new openness is sure to draw scholars bringing fresh and important new questions about Wright, his career, and his significance for his own time, as well as for our own.

But how does Wright matter now?

Read more here